mirror of
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:02 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #103] Clipboard does not work #78
Labels
No labels
HiDPI
bounty
bsd/freebsd
bsd/openbsd
bug
bug
build-infra
cantfix
critical
doc
duplicate
enhancement
fix-available
from git
from release
good first issue
help wanted
installer/package
invalid
linux
macOS
meta
needs testing
pull-request
query
question
regression
regression
v2.4.0
windows
wontfix
work-in-progress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/barrier#78
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @funnym0nk3y on GitHub (Jul 29, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/issues/103
Operating Systems
Server: Win10 64bit
Client: Win10 64bit
Barrier Version
2.1.0
Steps to reproduce bug
When running the software at both PCs there ist a problem with the clipboard. As the configuration states, there ist the possibility to transfer files via Drag-n-Drop between the machines. But when trying to do so, grabbing the file on the client works, but the release does not on the server. Also, when cutting on the client, the server does not recieve anything in it's clipboard. This problem existed also in Synergy.
@nsk7even commented on GitHub (Oct 8, 2018):
You may check my issue where I found out that the automatic elevation on the client side was responsible for the clipboard stopped working: https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/issues/141
@panaut0lordv commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2019):
It was also happening to me, both on latest Barrier and Synergy release Synergy_v1.9.0_rc3.msi (just copied that from the Windows VM via Barrier client! I am so happy :D).
However, while workaround works which means I'm no longer using Barrier LOCAL SYSTEM service (I've put it in disabled state for now) but rather "synergyc.exe IP" in my AppData/Roaming/Ms/Win/Start Menu/Programs/Startup I still have an issue.
As you might guess such a "solution" no longer allows me to click inside elevated popups or login back to my user's session (e.g. after using RDP to click an elevated popup).
Any tips on how to deal with it?
Preferably with software workaround, not simply keeping dedicated USB mouse passed through to my VM.
BTW I'm reading through this file https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/blob/master/src/lib/platform/MSWindowsClipboard.h
and one thing makes me wonder about that behaviour… because what I actually got wasn't a clipboard that wasn't updated - it was an empty clipboard. Does that help?
@panaut0lordv commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2019):
Referenced issue points that was fixed for user with 2.3.2 but is still affects me.
Server is Arch:
usr/bin/barriers --version
barriers 2.3.2-RELEASE
Protocol version 1.6
Client is Win10:
2.3.2-snapshot-210c2b70
Message on Windows client is:
clipboard changed: lost ownership
@andrejrcarvalho commented on GitHub (Jun 9, 2020):
I'm with the same problem. I'm runnig the server in a Windows 10 and the client on a Ubuntu. I have notice that the clipboard stops working when I copy something from de client.
@jamesgeddes commented on GitHub (Jul 14, 2020):
Same here, running Ubuntu and Win10 but cannot share clipboard between them. Would be super helpful if this worked.
@genebeck commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2020):
Similar problem here. Version 2.3.2 Windows 10 host, Windows 10 and Linux Mint 19 clients. Clipboard works for a while then no updating. Restart the Barrier using the GUI on the server then all works for and hour or 2. Not drag or drop or copy files. This is using the clipboard for just text.
This is very irritating.
@shymega commented on GitHub (Aug 28, 2020):
Closing in favour of #855, as it has a similar mechanic to drag and drop -- in this case, clipboard sync of files.
@jmrenouard commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):
Hi,
This issue is still present in 2.4.0
Changing setting Elevate to As needed on the server side solves this issue
But iI don't figure it out why this is impacting copy/paste feature
Thanks for this great piece of software, Barrier is awesome !
Jean-Marie
@juankb1024 commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2022):
I'm having the same issue in 2.4.0.
Using MacOS 12.4 Server and Windows 10 Client.
My problem is that the MacOS server does not have the "Elevate to" setting. Is this setting missing form the MacOS GUI?
Is there a way to force this setting in MacOS to see if it's related?
@JoeCodeswell commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023):
For me,
Barrier-Server: Windows 10
Barrier-Client: macOS 10.15.7
The clipboard works for a while & then stops working.
My WORKAROUND is to Reload the Server.
RESULT the clipboard starts working again.
Thanks for the GREAT PRODUCT.
Joe
@AdamStepinski0 commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2023):
I had copy paste not working on Windows. I had two server instances running
UPDATE: two server instances were reason for problem with copy paste
@shymega commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2023):
Barrier isn't maintained anymore. But more importantly, that's not how the architecture works - you need a server and client(s).
@jamesgeddes commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2023):
@shymega When was the decision taken to stop maintaining barrier? I cannot see any advisements on that. Could it become an Apache Software Foundation or Linux Foundation project?
@shymega commented on GitHub (Dec 19, 2023):
That decision was years back. We aren't obliged to advertise, and I explained numerous times on this tracker, but we won't be advertising on the Barrier repo. You can see the explanation here.
Input Leap is currently working on resolving the numerous bugs that have accumulated in Barrier, notably memory and CPU leaks, and updating to Qt 6 so that ARM64 can be supported on macOS.
And I don't think ASF or Linux Foundation will take Barrier on. In any case, Input Leap has diverged from Barrier and put more resources in, so it's not worth it. The differences are numerous, and it would be a waste of manpower.