[GH-ISSUE #5] Performance for ZFS-HA #6

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 03:28:14 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @v0112358 on GitHub (Mar 12, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ewwhite/zfs-ha/issues/5

Hello,

I'm interested in your project. Cloud you share some results of disk benchmark (IOPS and bandwidth)?

Originally created by @v0112358 on GitHub (Mar 12, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/ewwhite/zfs-ha/issues/5 Hello, I'm interested in your project. Cloud you share some results of disk benchmark (IOPS and bandwidth)?
Author
Owner

@ewwhite commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017):

Performance depends on your hardware selection and workload. Since we are talking about SAS, the performance does not differ from any direct-attached storage solution. The presence of the high-availability cluster components does not impact performance.

An example:
20 x 7200 RPM disks in RAIDZ1 groups of 5 drives gives me 1 Gigabyte/second writes and nearly the same for reads.

<!-- gh-comment-id:286337042 --> @ewwhite commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017): Performance depends on your hardware selection and workload. Since we are talking about SAS, the performance does not differ from any direct-attached storage solution. The presence of the high-availability cluster components does not impact performance. An example: 20 x 7200 RPM disks in RAIDZ1 groups of 5 drives gives me 1 Gigabyte/second writes and nearly the same for reads.
Author
Owner

@v0112358 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017):

Thank you so much for your valuable information. How about IOPS for random read and write (SAS devices and zeusRAM for ZIL)?

<!-- gh-comment-id:286337727 --> @v0112358 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017): Thank you so much for your valuable information. How about IOPS for random read and write (SAS devices and zeusRAM for ZIL)?
Author
Owner

@ewwhite commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017):

Again, that performance is going to depend on who's consuming the data, networking interconnect, number and type of disks, etc.

<!-- gh-comment-id:288235334 --> @ewwhite commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2017): Again, that performance is going to depend on who's consuming the data, networking interconnect, number and type of disks, etc.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
pull-request
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/zfs-ha#6
No description provided.