[GH-ISSUE #106] About Qt Binary License #65

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 11:03:06 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @masums on GitHub (Feb 18, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/qmlnet/qmlnet/issues/106

This project is developing under MIT license but what is the license policy for Qt native binaries?

Originally created by @masums on GitHub (Feb 18, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/qmlnet/qmlnet/issues/106 This project is developing under MIT license but what is the license policy for Qt native binaries?
Author
Owner

@webprofusion-chrisc commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2019):

Qt is LGPL, So if just distributing (and linking to) binaries it just need to include a license statement saying it includes the LGPL libraries. If on the other hand the Qt binaries are custom then the customization need to be LGPL as well.

<!-- gh-comment-id:467777960 --> @webprofusion-chrisc commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2019): Qt is LGPL, So if just distributing (and linking to) binaries it just need to include a license statement saying it includes the LGPL libraries. If on the other hand the Qt binaries are custom then the customization need to be LGPL as well.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/qmlnet#65
No description provided.