[GH-ISSUE #423] Allow IP CIDRs in `visitor-request-limit-exempt-hosts` #328

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-05 04:00:20 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 1 comment

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 04:00:20 -06:00

Owner

Originally created by @karmanyaahm on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/423

For example, visitor-request-limit-exempt-hosts=matrix.me.org,1.1.1.1,172.0.18.0/16. Then, all of 172.0.18.0/16 will be exempt in addition to matrix.me.org and 1.1.1.1.

This will help with https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/pull/2135, where there is no way to exempt requests from a whole network.
Is this feature fine with you? If so, I can make a PR within the next few weeks.

Originally created by @karmanyaahm on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/423 For example, `visitor-request-limit-exempt-hosts=matrix.me.org,1.1.1.1,172.0.18.0/16`. Then, all of 172.0.18.0/16 will be exempt in addition to matrix.me.org and 1.1.1.1. This will help with https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/pull/2135, where there is no way to exempt requests from a whole network. Is this feature fine with you? If so, I can make a PR within the next few weeks.

gitea-mirror

2026-05-05 04:00:20 -06:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

server
labels

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 04:00:24 -06:00

Author

Owner

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022):

This looks like a good feature and should be easy enough to implement I think.

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022): This looks like a good feature and should be easy enough to implement I think.