github-starred/libxlsxwriter
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter.git synced 2026-05-15 14:15:54 -06:00
Code Issues 16 Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[GH-ISSUE #347] Test failure on i686 and armv7hl #278

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-05 12:05:26 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 9 comments
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:26 -06:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @manisandro on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter/issues/347

Originally assigned to: @jmcnamara on GitHub.

We are hitting the following test failure on Fedora/i686:

TEST 42/381 utility:test_unixtime [FAIL]
  ERR: /builddir/build/BUILD/libxlsxwriter-RELEASE_1.1.0/test/unit/utility/test_datetime_to_excel.c:644
	expected 0,
	got      49711.3

See [1] for full build.log, and root.log containing version of compiler etc.

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72411207

Originally created by @manisandro on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter/issues/347 Originally assigned to: @jmcnamara on GitHub. We are hitting the following test failure on Fedora/i686: TEST 42/381 utility:test_unixtime [FAIL] ERR: /builddir/build/BUILD/libxlsxwriter-RELEASE_1.1.0/test/unit/utility/test_datetime_to_excel.c:644 expected 0, got 49711.3 See [1] for full build.log, and root.log containing version of compiler etc. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72411207
gitea-mirror 2026-05-05 12:05:26 -06:00
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:31 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021):

Same on armv7hl

<!-- gh-comment-id:885499533 --> @manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021): Same on armv7hl
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:32 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021):

Thanks for the report. I'll look into it.

Could you add a link to the armv7hl logs.

<!-- gh-comment-id:885525079 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021): Thanks for the report. I'll look into it. Could you add a link to the armv7hl logs.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:35 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021):

Sure: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72478759

<!-- gh-comment-id:885526301 --> @manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021): Sure: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72478759
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:37 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021):

Also, where can I get an iso for fedora 35 for testing?

<!-- gh-comment-id:885526904 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021): Also, where can I get an iso for fedora 35 for testing?
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:39 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021):

Here is the latest rawhide compose:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20210722.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20210722.n.0.iso

<!-- gh-comment-id:885529424 --> @manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2021): Here is the latest rawhide compose: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20210722.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20210722.n.0.iso
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021):

@manisandro could you add the output for the following from one or both of those systems:

echo | gcc -E -xc -include 'time.h' - | grep time_t | grep typedef
<!-- gh-comment-id:886975014 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2021): @manisandro could you add the output for the following from one or both of those systems: ``` echo | gcc -E -xc -include 'time.h' - | grep time_t | grep typedef ```
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021):

Here is a scratch build which also executes the command you posted [1]. For the arches of interest, you'll find the output in the respective build.logs.

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72727811

<!-- gh-comment-id:887272697 --> @manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021): Here is a scratch build which also executes the command you posted [1]. For the arches of interest, you'll find the output in the respective build.logs. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72727811
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021):

@manisandro Thanks for that.

I've pushed a fix for this to the main branch if you could test it.

<!-- gh-comment-id:887670033 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021): @manisandro Thanks for that. I've pushed a fix for this to the main branch if you could test it.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:05:46 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021):

Looks good, thanks [1]!

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72771694

<!-- gh-comment-id:887703857 --> @manisandro commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021): Looks good, thanks [1]! [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72771694
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
coverity
cmake-improvements
cmake_pkgconfig_fix
ctest
button
tables
autofilter
dtoa
iwyu
openssl
gentoo
gh310
condition_format
rich_string_html
header_footer_images
custom_data_labels
object_position
gh265
constant_mode_comments2
constant_mode_comments
vml
md5
vcpkg
hyperlinks
api_refactor
win_fopen
gh203
rich_strings
chartsheet
in_mem_image
gh192
revert-162-master
data_validation
meson
charts
scan_build
utf8_strlen
tmpfileplus
custom_properties
insert_image
default_row
control_chars
worksheet_protect
dev
red_black
panes
mkstemp
defined_names
optimise
wip
v1.2.4
v1.2.3
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.1.9
v1.1.8
RELEASE_1.1.7
RELEASE_1.1.6
RELEASE_1.1.5
RELEASE_1.1.4
RELEASE_1.1.3
RELEASE_1.1.2
RELEASE_1.1.1
RELEASE_1.1.0
RELEASE_1.0.9
RELEASE_1.0.8
RELEASE_1.0.7
RELEASE_1.0.6
RELEASE_1.0.5
RELEASE_1.0.4
RELEASE_1.0.3
RELEASE_1.0.2
RELEASE_1.0.1
RELEASE_1.0.0
RELEASE_0.9.9
RELEASE_0.9.8
RELEASE_0.9.7
RELEASE_0.9.6
RELEASE_0.9.5
RELEASE_0.9.4
RELEASE_0.9.3
RELEASE_0.9.2
RELEASE_0.9.1
RELEASE_0.9.0
RELEASE_0.8.9
RELEASE_0.8.8
RELEASE_0.8.7
RELEASE_0.8.6
RELEASE_0.8.5
RELEASE_0.8.4
RELEASE_0.8.3
RELEASE_0.8.2
RELEASE_0.8.1
RELEASE_0.8.0
RELEASE_0.7.9
RELEASE_0.7.8
RELEASE_0.7.7
RELEASE_0.7.6
RELEASE_0.7.5
RELEASE_0.7.4
RELEASE_0.7.3
RELEASE_0.7.2
RELEASE_0.7.1
RELEASE_0.7.0
RELEASE_0.6.9
RELEASE_0.6.8
RELEASE_0.6.7
RELEASE_0.6.6
RELEASE_0.6.5
RELEASE_0.6.4
RELEASE_0.6.3
RELEASE_0.6.2
RELEASE_0.6.1
RELEASE_0.6.0
RELEASE_0.5.9
RELEASE_0.5.8
RELEASE_0.5.7
RELEASE_0.5.6
RELEASE_0.5.5
RELEASE_0.5.4
RELEASE_0.5.3
RELEASE_0.5.2
RELEASE_0.5.1
RELEASE_0.5.0
RELEASE_0.4.9
RELEASE_0.4.8
RELEASE_0.4.7
RELEASE_0.4.6
RELEASE_0.4.5
RELEASE_0.4.4
RELEASE_0.4.3
RELEASE_0.4.2
RELEASE_0.4.1
RELEASE_0.4.0
RELEASE_0.3.9
RELEASE_0.3.8
RELEASE_0.3.7
RELEASE_0.3.6
RELEASE_0.3.5
RELEASE_0.3.4
RELEASE_0.3.3
RELEASE_0.3.2
RELEASE_0.3.1
RELEASE_0.3.0
RELEASE_0.2.9
RELEASE_0.2.8
RELEASE_0.2.7
RELEASE_0.2.6
RELEASE_0.2.5
RELEASE_0.2.4
RELEASE_0.2.3
RELEASE_0.2.2
RELEASE_0.2.1
RELEASE_0.2.0
RELEASE_0.1.9
RELEASE_0.1.8
RELEASE_0.1.7
RELEASE_0.1.6
RELEASE_0.1.5
RELEASE_0.1.4
RELEASE_0.1.3
RELEASE_0.1.2
RELEASE_0.1.1
RELEASE_0.1.0
RELEASE_0.0.9
RELEASE_0.0.8
RELEASE_0.0.7
RELEASE_0.0.6
RELEASE_0.0.5
RELEASE_0.0.4
RELEASE_0.0.3
RELEASE_0.0.2
RELEASE_0.0.1
Labels
Clear labels   
awaiting user feedback

   
bug

   
cmake

   
cmake

   
docs

   
feature request

   
in progress

   
long term

   
medium term

   
medium term

   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
question

   
ready to close

   
short term

   
under investigation

   
wontfix
No labels
awaiting user feedback
bug
cmake
cmake
docs
feature request
in progress
long term
medium term
medium term
pull-request
question
question
ready to close
short term
under investigation
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/libxlsxwriter#278
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?