github-starred/libxlsxwriter
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter.git synced 2026-05-15 14:15:54 -06:00
Code Issues 16 Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[GH-ISSUE #325] Swift Package Manager Support #259

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-05 12:03:18 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 3 comments
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:03:18 -06:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @willm132 on GitHub (Apr 20, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter/issues/325

Originally assigned to: @jmcnamara on GitHub.

Will this project get SPM support in the future? It appears to still me maintained.

Originally created by @willm132 on GitHub (Apr 20, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/jmcnamara/libxlsxwriter/issues/325 Originally assigned to: @jmcnamara on GitHub. Will this project get SPM support in the future? It appears to still me maintained.
gitea-mirror 2026-05-05 12:03:18 -06:00
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:03:22 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2021):

Hi Will,

It could be added. I don't know what is involved and I don't actually use Swift but maybe someone else will step in to do it. There is already support for Cocoa Pods: https://libxlsxwriter.github.io/getting_started.html#gsg_cocoapods

<!-- gh-comment-id:823317408 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2021): Hi Will, It could be added. I don't know what is involved and I don't actually use Swift but maybe someone else will step in to do it. There is already support for Cocoa Pods: https://libxlsxwriter.github.io/getting_started.html#gsg_cocoapods
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:03:24 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2021):

Closing. I recommend using Cocoa Pods instead.

<!-- gh-comment-id:824027185 --> @jmcnamara commented on GitHub (Apr 21, 2021): Closing. I recommend using Cocoa Pods instead.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 12:03:25 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@mariohahn commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2022):

As the time goes by and SPM is more and more common, I think we could reopen that issue and add SPM?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1108615529 --> @mariohahn commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2022): As the time goes by and SPM is more and more common, I think we could reopen that issue and add SPM?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
coverity
cmake-improvements
cmake_pkgconfig_fix
ctest
button
tables
autofilter
dtoa
iwyu
openssl
gentoo
gh310
condition_format
rich_string_html
header_footer_images
custom_data_labels
object_position
gh265
constant_mode_comments2
constant_mode_comments
vml
md5
vcpkg
hyperlinks
api_refactor
win_fopen
gh203
rich_strings
chartsheet
in_mem_image
gh192
revert-162-master
data_validation
meson
charts
scan_build
utf8_strlen
tmpfileplus
custom_properties
insert_image
default_row
control_chars
worksheet_protect
dev
red_black
panes
mkstemp
defined_names
optimise
wip
v1.2.4
v1.2.3
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.1.9
v1.1.8
RELEASE_1.1.7
RELEASE_1.1.6
RELEASE_1.1.5
RELEASE_1.1.4
RELEASE_1.1.3
RELEASE_1.1.2
RELEASE_1.1.1
RELEASE_1.1.0
RELEASE_1.0.9
RELEASE_1.0.8
RELEASE_1.0.7
RELEASE_1.0.6
RELEASE_1.0.5
RELEASE_1.0.4
RELEASE_1.0.3
RELEASE_1.0.2
RELEASE_1.0.1
RELEASE_1.0.0
RELEASE_0.9.9
RELEASE_0.9.8
RELEASE_0.9.7
RELEASE_0.9.6
RELEASE_0.9.5
RELEASE_0.9.4
RELEASE_0.9.3
RELEASE_0.9.2
RELEASE_0.9.1
RELEASE_0.9.0
RELEASE_0.8.9
RELEASE_0.8.8
RELEASE_0.8.7
RELEASE_0.8.6
RELEASE_0.8.5
RELEASE_0.8.4
RELEASE_0.8.3
RELEASE_0.8.2
RELEASE_0.8.1
RELEASE_0.8.0
RELEASE_0.7.9
RELEASE_0.7.8
RELEASE_0.7.7
RELEASE_0.7.6
RELEASE_0.7.5
RELEASE_0.7.4
RELEASE_0.7.3
RELEASE_0.7.2
RELEASE_0.7.1
RELEASE_0.7.0
RELEASE_0.6.9
RELEASE_0.6.8
RELEASE_0.6.7
RELEASE_0.6.6
RELEASE_0.6.5
RELEASE_0.6.4
RELEASE_0.6.3
RELEASE_0.6.2
RELEASE_0.6.1
RELEASE_0.6.0
RELEASE_0.5.9
RELEASE_0.5.8
RELEASE_0.5.7
RELEASE_0.5.6
RELEASE_0.5.5
RELEASE_0.5.4
RELEASE_0.5.3
RELEASE_0.5.2
RELEASE_0.5.1
RELEASE_0.5.0
RELEASE_0.4.9
RELEASE_0.4.8
RELEASE_0.4.7
RELEASE_0.4.6
RELEASE_0.4.5
RELEASE_0.4.4
RELEASE_0.4.3
RELEASE_0.4.2
RELEASE_0.4.1
RELEASE_0.4.0
RELEASE_0.3.9
RELEASE_0.3.8
RELEASE_0.3.7
RELEASE_0.3.6
RELEASE_0.3.5
RELEASE_0.3.4
RELEASE_0.3.3
RELEASE_0.3.2
RELEASE_0.3.1
RELEASE_0.3.0
RELEASE_0.2.9
RELEASE_0.2.8
RELEASE_0.2.7
RELEASE_0.2.6
RELEASE_0.2.5
RELEASE_0.2.4
RELEASE_0.2.3
RELEASE_0.2.2
RELEASE_0.2.1
RELEASE_0.2.0
RELEASE_0.1.9
RELEASE_0.1.8
RELEASE_0.1.7
RELEASE_0.1.6
RELEASE_0.1.5
RELEASE_0.1.4
RELEASE_0.1.3
RELEASE_0.1.2
RELEASE_0.1.1
RELEASE_0.1.0
RELEASE_0.0.9
RELEASE_0.0.8
RELEASE_0.0.7
RELEASE_0.0.6
RELEASE_0.0.5
RELEASE_0.0.4
RELEASE_0.0.3
RELEASE_0.0.2
RELEASE_0.0.1
Labels
Clear labels   
awaiting user feedback

   
bug

   
cmake

   
cmake

   
docs

   
feature request

   
in progress

   
long term

   
medium term

   
medium term

   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
question

   
ready to close

   
short term

   
under investigation

   
wontfix
No labels
awaiting user feedback
bug
cmake
cmake
docs
feature request
in progress
long term
medium term
medium term
pull-request
question
question
ready to close
short term
under investigation
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/libxlsxwriter#259
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?