github-starred/lan-mouse
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/feschber/lan-mouse.git synced 2026-05-15 14:15:52 -06:00
Code Issues 107 Projects Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[GH-ISSUE #381] Latest builds must rely on Glibc 2.39b #199

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-05-05 22:13:39 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 5 comments
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:39 -06:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @huangsijun17 on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/feschber/lan-mouse/issues/381

The latest version of the Github Action build doesn't work in my OpenSUS 15.6, suggesting that GlibC 2.39 is required.

❯ ldd --version
ldd (GNU libc) 2.38
Copyright (C) 2023 自由软件基金会。
这是一个自由软件；请见源代码的授权条款。本软件不含任何没有担保；甚至不保证适销性
或者适合某些特殊目的。
由 Roland McGrath 和 Ulrich Drepper 编写。

❯ /home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse --version
/home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by /home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse)

If there are no strong dependencies, I would like to lower the GlibC version requirement to improve compatibility.

Originally created by @huangsijun17 on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/feschber/lan-mouse/issues/381 The latest version of the Github Action build doesn't work in my OpenSUS 15.6, suggesting that GlibC 2.39 is required. ``` ❯ ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.38 Copyright (C) 2023 自由软件基金会。 这是一个自由软件；请见源代码的授权条款。本软件不含任何没有担保；甚至不保证适销性 或者适合某些特殊目的。 由 Roland McGrath 和 Ulrich Drepper 编写。 ❯ /home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse --version /home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by /home/huang/Downloads/lan-mouse) ``` If there are no strong dependencies, I would like to lower the GlibC version requirement to improve compatibility.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:41 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@feschber commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026):

Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39.

I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ...

<!-- gh-comment-id:3871271556 --> @feschber commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026): Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39. I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ...
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:42 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026):

Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39.

I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ...

I was using the release version before, haven't tried the Action build version yet.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3871691413 --> @huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026): > Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39. > > I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ... I was using the release version before, haven't tried the Action build version yet.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:43 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026):

Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39.

I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ...

I was using the release version before, haven't tried the Action build version yet.
I relied on local builds to solve the problem of high glibc dependency versions. Just a note on the issue that the current version of glibc may not be suitable for distribution or even trial use.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3871712237 --> @huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2026): > Did this only occur in recent development releases? As far as I know, the ubuntu-latest runners have been on 24.04 LTS for a while now, which uses glibc 2.39. > > I don't think it would be an issue to downgrade to 22.04 for release builds, just curious if something else is the issue here ... I was using the release version before, haven't tried the Action build version yet. I relied on local builds to solve the problem of high glibc dependency versions. Just a note on the issue that the current version of glibc may not be suitable for distribution or even trial use.
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@feschber commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

Should now be fixed (#382)

<!-- gh-comment-id:3875722930 --> @feschber commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): Should now be fixed (#382)
gitea-mirror commented 2026-05-05 22:13:44 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

Should now be fixed (#382)

well. It can work.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3876782360 --> @huangsijun17 commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): > Should now be fixed ([#382](https://github.com/feschber/lan-mouse/pull/382)) well. It can work.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
attach-dialog-to-window
windows-msi-installer
config-watcher
fix-ci
update-cachix-workflow
build-on-22.04
update-ci
save-config
macos-fix-scroll-capture
improve-connection-reliability
improve-macos-capture
macos-capture-modifier-keys
reset-double-click-on-move
fix-duplicate-key-release
emulate-double-click
fix-scrolling
prevent-authorization-request-spam
revert-scrolling-behaviour
up-deps
macos-cleanup-event-thread
macos-input-capture-fix
fix-gtk-widget-parent
fix-clippy-warnings
fix-mandatory-client-config
connection-accept-notification
change-config-syntax
rework-cli-frontend
feschber-patch-1
gtk-frontend-rework
dns-fix
remove-git-dep
encryption
fix-wl-object-recreation
macos-client-side-modifier-events
log-keypress
fix-key-repeat
cleanup-server
cleanup
extract-frontend
drop-hard-dep-shortcut-inhibit
include-commit-hash-in-version
capture-dummy-events
local-channel
lan-mouse-proto
cleanup-capture-task
derive-barrier-id-from-cursor
capture-error-handling
purge-anyhow
drop-dispatch-hack
split-crates
configurable-emulation-backend
configurable-capture-backend
hyprland-fix
fix-UB-transmute
fix-usize-assumed-8-bytes
enter-hook
display-util
fix-display-scaling
x11-event-producer
main
lan-mouse-proto-v0.2.0
lan-mouse-ipc-v0.2.0
lan-mouse-gtk-v0.2.0
lan-mouse-cli-v0.2.0
input-event-v0.3.0
input-emulation-v0.3.0
input-capture-v0.3.0
v0.10.0
v0.9.1
input-emulation-v0.2.1
v0.9.0
input-emulation-v0.2.0
input-capture-v0.2.0
input-event-v0.2.1
input-event-v0.2.0
input-emulation-v0.1.0
input-capture-v0.1.0
input-event-v0.1.0
v0.8.0
v0.7.3
v0.7.2
v0.7.0
v0.6.0
v0.5.1
v0.5.0
v0.4.0
v0.3.3
v0.3.2
v0.3.1
v0.3.0
v0.2.1
v0.2.0
v0.1.1
v0.1.1-alpha.1
0.1.1-alpha.1
Labels
Clear labels   
Xorg

   
documentation

   
enhancement

   
macos

   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
windows
No labels
Xorg
documentation
enhancement
macos
pull-request
question
windows
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/lan-mouse#199
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?