mirror of
https://github.com/fatedier/frp.git
synced 2026-05-15 08:05:49 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #635] What is the working requirement of xtcp module? #493
Labels
No labels
In Progress
WIP
WaitingForInfo
bug
doc
duplicate
easy
enhancement
future
help wanted
invalid
lifecycle/stale
need-issue-template
need-usage-help
no plan
proposal
pull-request
question
todo
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/frp#493
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @886yy40 on GitHub (Feb 6, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/635
Issue is only used for submiting bug report and documents typo. If there are same issues or answers can be found in documents, we will close it directly.
(为了节约时间,提高处理问题的效率,不按照格式填写的 issue 将会直接关闭。)
Use the commands below to provide key information from your environment:
You do NOT have to include this information if this is a FEATURE REQUEST
What version of frp are you using (./frpc -v or ./frps -v)?
I've tried 0.14.1 and 0.16.0, but neither of them worked.
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (
go env)?frps on linux64
frpc on mipsle and win64
Steps to reproduce the issue:
frps.ini
frpc_router.ini
frpc_pc.txt
ps: all tcp and udp ports are opened on my router, all udp ports are opened on my pc, udp and tcp
ports used in the conf files are also opened on my server.
Describe the results you received:
I tried several times, all failed with the message below (ip address of my server was in +).
Describe the results you expected:
I want to know the working requirement of xtcp module, need all clients own a public ip or they have to be under a same LAN?
Since the bandwith of VPS is really expensive, xtcp transmission will be great helpful in saving bandwith of the server, I am looking forward to its application, thank you.
@fatedier commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2018):
It depands on the device's NAT type. It's a early version, not good for all devices.