[GH-ISSUE #568] 关于tcp_mux #444

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 12:16:29 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @wwqgtxx on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/568

请问一下在设置了和服务器之间使用kcp通讯的时候,tcp_mux这个设置对最终的通讯有影响么,会不会最终也只会新建一个kcp链接呢

Originally created by @wwqgtxx on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/568 请问一下在设置了和服务器之间使用kcp通讯的时候,tcp_mux这个设置对最终的通讯有影响么,会不会最终也只会新建一个kcp链接呢
Author
Owner

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017):

Yes.

<!-- gh-comment-id:353036426 --> @fatedier commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2017): Yes.
Author
Owner

@wwqgtxx commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2017):

那么提个建议,在客户端使用kcp通讯来转发udp的时候服务器是否可以直接在udp通道上转发数据,而不用再用kcp包一层,毕竟这个时候没必要实现拥塞控制,多加一层kcp反而会影响转发效率

<!-- gh-comment-id:353220097 --> @wwqgtxx commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2017): 那么提个建议,在客户端使用kcp通讯来转发udp的时候服务器是否可以直接在udp通道上转发数据,而不用再用kcp包一层,毕竟这个时候没必要实现拥塞控制,多加一层kcp反而会影响转发效率
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/frp#444
No description provided.