[GH-ISSUE #4922] [Feature Request] Add socket reuse flag

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:50 -06:00

Owner

Copy link

Originally created by @f0re1gnKey on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4922

Describe the feature request

Added a socket listener reuse flag to facilitate simultaneous listening on 127.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Affected area

Docs
Installation
Performance and Scalability
Security
User Experience
Test and Release
Developer Infrastructure
Client Plugin
Server Plugin
Extensions
Others

Originally created by @f0re1gnKey on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4922 ### Describe the feature request Added a socket listener reuse flag to facilitate simultaneous listening on 127.0.0.1 and 0.0.0.0 ### Describe alternatives you've considered _No response_ ### Affected area - [ ] Docs - [ ] Installation - [ ] Performance and Scalability - [ ] Security - [ ] User Experience - [ ] Test and Release - [ ] Developer Infrastructure - [ ] Client Plugin - [ ] Server Plugin - [ ] Extensions - [ ] Others

gitea-mirror closed this issue

2026-05-05 14:28:51 -06:00

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:53 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025):

We usually need to approach problems based on actual needs and try to do things in the simplest way possible.

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025): We usually need to approach problems based on actual needs and try to do things in the simplest way possible.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:54 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@f0re1gnKey commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025):

We usually need to approach problems based on actual needs and try to do things in the simplest way possible.

Two services are running on the server at the same time. One is the edge control access service responsible for controlling access, and the other is the frp service responsible for exposing intranet services. Legitimate access will be forwarded from the edge control service to frp's 127.0.0.1. The server has one static IP and multiple dynamic IPs, which makes it inconvenient to limit the listening IP of edge services. I also expose multiple ports externally, typically configuring them to automatically forward traffic to the same port.

@f0re1gnKey commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025): > We usually need to approach problems based on actual needs and try to do things in the simplest way possible. Two services are running on the server at the same time. One is the edge control access service responsible for controlling access, and the other is the frp service responsible for exposing intranet services. Legitimate access will be forwarded from the edge control service to frp's 127.0.0.1. The server has one static IP and multiple dynamic IPs, which makes it inconvenient to limit the listening IP of edge services. I also expose multiple ports externally, typically configuring them to automatically forward traffic to the same port.

No Branch/Tag specified