[GH-ISSUE #4901] [Feature Request] stcp multiplexer

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:15 -06:00

Owner

Copy link

Originally created by @PablexXXXX on GitHub (Jul 26, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4901

Describe the feature request

First, great software people, great work. Congratulations. It would be very usefull to be able to bind multiple stc proxies to the same frps port, just like the ssh multiplexer.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Thanks again for this great proyect.

Affected area

Docs
Installation
Performance and Scalability
Security
User Experience
Test and Release
Developer Infrastructure
Client Plugin
Server Plugin
Extensions
Others

Originally created by @PablexXXXX on GitHub (Jul 26, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4901 ### Describe the feature request First, great software people, great work. Congratulations. It would be very usefull to be able to bind multiple stc proxies to the same frps port, just like the ssh multiplexer. ### Describe alternatives you've considered Thanks again for this great proyect. ### Affected area - [ ] Docs - [ ] Installation - [x] Performance and Scalability - [ ] Security - [x] User Experience - [ ] Test and Release - [ ] Developer Infrastructure - [ ] Client Plugin - [ ] Server Plugin - [ ] Extensions - [ ] Others

gitea-mirror closed this issue

2026-05-05 14:28:15 -06:00

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:17 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2025):

This will stop the need to create multiple instances of frps and also open more ports on the public server

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2025): This will stop the need to create multiple instances of frps and also open more ports on the public server

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:19 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025):

It seems you're not very familiar with STCP. This type doesn't require additional port binding on frps.

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025): It seems you're not very familiar with STCP. This type doesn't require additional port binding on frps.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:20 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025):

Fatedier my friend, I´m blown away. You are absolutely true. Using just one server with one port I can use multiple locations and visitors. Thank you for your generosity.

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025): Fatedier my friend, I´m blown away. You are absolutely true. Using just one server with one port I can use multiple locations and visitors. Thank you for your generosity.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:28:20 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025):

I will replace all my cloudflares conections using frp. No enterprise intermediaries. THANKS AGAIN.

@PablexXXXX commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025): I will replace all my cloudflares conections using frp. No enterprise intermediaries. THANKS AGAIN.

No Branch/Tag specified