[GH-ISSUE #4312] Please create a guide on how to make a TCP reverse tunnel for games like Minecraft

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:11:27 -06:00

Owner

Copy link

Originally created by @ImGGAAVVIINN on GitHub (Jun 30, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4312

Describe the feature request

It would be very useful if a section in the README.md is dedicated to tunnelling for games and how to maximise the speed. Since the guides of TCP reverse tunnelling is spread across the long documentation and is hard to follow and under which protocol should be used to hosting (TCP Port Multiplexing OR TCP Stream Multiplexing)

Describe alternatives you've considered

I tried to follow the tutorial, but are unable to succeed in tunnelling for a Minecraft server.

Affected area

Docs
Installation
Performance and Scalability
Security
User Experience
Test and Release
Developer Infrastructure
Client Plugin
Server Plugin
Extensions
Others

Originally created by @ImGGAAVVIINN on GitHub (Jun 30, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4312 ### Describe the feature request It would be very useful if a section in the README.md is dedicated to tunnelling for games and how to maximise the speed. Since the guides of TCP reverse tunnelling is spread across the long documentation and is hard to follow and under which protocol should be used to hosting (TCP Port Multiplexing OR TCP Stream Multiplexing) ### Describe alternatives you've considered I tried to follow the tutorial, but are unable to succeed in tunnelling for a Minecraft server. ### Affected area - [X] Docs - [ ] Installation - [ ] Performance and Scalability - [ ] Security - [X] User Experience - [ ] Test and Release - [ ] Developer Infrastructure - [ ] Client Plugin - [ ] Server Plugin - [ ] Extensions - [ ] Others

gitea-mirror

2026-05-05 14:11:27 -06:00

closed this issue
added the
lifecycle/stale
label

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:11:30 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2024):

We currently do not have such a plan. If there is enough time in the future, the document content will be migrated to an independent document site, which may be more suitable for such content.

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2024): We currently do not have such a plan. If there is enough time in the future, the document content will be migrated to an independent document site, which may be more suitable for such content.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:11:30 -06:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2024):

Issues go stale after 21d of inactivity. Stale issues rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2024): Issues go stale after 21d of inactivity. Stale issues rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.

No Branch/Tag specified