mirror of
https://github.com/fatedier/frp.git
synced 2026-05-15 16:15:49 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #4304] XTCP 比 TCP 更耗资源吗？ #3398
Labels
No labels
In Progress
WIP
WaitingForInfo
bug
doc
duplicate
easy
enhancement
future
help wanted
invalid
lifecycle/stale
need-issue-template
need-usage-help
no plan
proposal
pull-request
question
todo
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/frp#3398
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @hzqim on GitHub (Jun 26, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4304
Bug Description
使用DOCKER部署，在相同的机器，相同的时间段走 IPV6， 看同一个在线视频，XTCP没有添加压缩选项，TCP的速度几乎是XTCP的两倍，在后台观察到TCP模式下 CPU 使用率在 13% 左右浮动，而XTCP的CPU使用率大约是 35%.
frpc Version
0.58.1
frps Version
0.58.1
System Architecture
SERVER/Debian/amd64, CLIENT/OpenWRT/arm64
Configurations
这是 XTCP 协议固有的缺点吗？比如 NAT 开销，但 IPV6 应该不用 NAT？
Logs
No response
Steps to reproduce
...
Affected area
@wuai1024 commented on GitHub (Jun 27, 2024):
ipv6 我理解是可以直连的啊。目前我用了很多
xtcp没有测试过性能问题。@xqzr commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2024):
xtcp 访问端和客户端之间连接，使用 QUIC（基于 UDP）