[GH-ISSUE #4257] [Feature Request] Combine `frpc` and `frps` to a single executable binary #3353

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-05 14:09:47 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 3 comments

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:09:47 -06:00

Owner

Originally created by @kkocdko on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4257

Provide single executable with frpc + frps will be nice.

Not sure is this issue duplicated or not. I can make a PR to do this.

Originally created by @kkocdko on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/4257 Provide single executable with `frpc` + `frps` will be nice. Not sure is this issue duplicated or not. I can make a PR to do this.

gitea-mirror closed this issue

2026-05-05 14:09:47 -06:00

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:09:49 -06:00

Author

Owner

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024):

We currently do not prefer to do so from the perspective of binary file size.

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024): We currently do not prefer to do so from the perspective of binary file size.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:09:50 -06:00

Author

Owner

@kkocdko commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024):

However binary with frps+frpc will reduce amount file size IMO.

@kkocdko commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024): However binary with frps+frpc will reduce amount file size IMO.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 14:09:52 -06:00

Author

Owner

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024):

Usually frpc and frps are placed on different machines, not together.

frpc may be distributed widely, while frps is not.

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2024): Usually frpc and frps are placed on different machines, not together. frpc may be distributed widely, while frps is not.