[GH-ISSUE #3475] Direct udp connect between clients and Server B like Zero Tier, Tailscale #2776

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 13:47:28 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @siliconhippy on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/3475

Describe the feature request

Is there a way to establish a direct udp connection between clients and Server B, after initial Server A setup, to avoid distant Server A latencies ?

This is a Zero Tier and Tailscale feature useful for gaming and VoIP.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Tailscale and Zero Tier

Affected area

  • Docs
  • Installation
  • Performance and Scalability
  • Security
  • User Experience
  • Test and Release
  • Developer Infrastructure
  • Client Plugin
  • Server Plugin
  • Extensions
  • Others
Originally created by @siliconhippy on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/3475 ### Describe the feature request Is there a way to establish a direct udp connection between clients and Server B, after initial Server A setup, to avoid distant Server A latencies ? This is a Zero Tier and Tailscale feature useful for gaming and VoIP. ### Describe alternatives you've considered Tailscale and Zero Tier ### Affected area - [ ] Docs - [ ] Installation - [X] Performance and Scalability - [ ] Security - [X] User Experience - [ ] Test and Release - [X] Developer Infrastructure - [X] Client Plugin - [X] Server Plugin - [ ] Extensions - [ ] Others
Author
Owner

@Becods commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023):

https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/1729

So why don't you just use ZeroTier or Tailscale?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1574835520 --> @Becods commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023): https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/1729 So why don't you just use ZeroTier or Tailscale?
Author
Owner

@siliconhippy commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023):

I like frp.
Looks simpler, and with less encryption overhead, maybe latency improvements ! ( Someone needs to inform me...)

This question is the same as why code frp when there are so many alternatives like above.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1575134375 --> @siliconhippy commented on GitHub (Jun 3, 2023): I like frp. Looks simpler, and with less encryption overhead, maybe latency improvements ! ( Someone needs to inform me...) This question is the same as why code frp when there are so many alternatives like above.
Author
Owner

@fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2023):

Repeated issues will be closed.

We have recently made some improvements to xtcp, which may help to achieve this ability. Currently, the implementation path for this feature is not very clear and there is no clear plan.

<!-- gh-comment-id:1575542599 --> @fatedier commented on GitHub (Jun 4, 2023): Repeated issues will be closed. We have recently made some improvements to xtcp, which may help to achieve this ability. Currently, the implementation path for this feature is not very clear and there is no clear plan.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/frp#2776
No description provided.