mirror of
https://github.com/fatedier/frp.git
synced 2026-05-15 08:05:49 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #1769] P2P-xtcp-Error:get sid from client error #1398
Labels
No labels
In Progress
WIP
WaitingForInfo
bug
doc
duplicate
easy
enhancement
future
help wanted
invalid
lifecycle/stale
need-issue-template
need-usage-help
no plan
proposal
pull-request
question
todo
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/frp#1398
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @FannyTony on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/fatedier/frp/issues/1769
frpc xtcp Error:get sid from client error
frpc xtcp 报错:get sid from client error
Different ports report errors
不同的端口报告错误
Note:Send and receive (frpc)Prompt the same error
注:发送端和接收端都提示相同的错误
Server(frps)No error message
服务端(frps)无错误信息
环境:内网frps服务器可正常访问,切换至腾讯云报错
服务器:腾讯云
被访问端:内网NAS
访问端:内网/外网Win7/10-x64/
2020/04/19 13:34:18 [I] [service.go:282] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] login to server success, get run id [dae5b41c905f6fe7], server udp port [9809]
2020/04/19 13:34:18 [I] [visitor_manager.go:86] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] start visitor success
2020/04/19 13:34:18 [I] [visitor_manager.go:86] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] start visitor success
2020/04/19 13:34:18 [I] [visitor_manager.go:86] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] start visitor success
2020/04/19 13:34:18 [I] [visitor_manager.go:130] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] visitor added: [P2P_NAS_5000_Visitor P2P_NAS_5001_Visitor P2P_Drive_Visitor]
2020/04/19 13:34:32 [W] [visitor.go:281] [dae5b41c905f6fe7] [P2P_NAS_5001_Visitor] get sid from client error: read udp ...:58454->...:46493: i/o timeout
@fatedier commented on GitHub (Apr 20, 2020):
https://github.com/fatedier/frp/blob/master/README_zh.md#%E7%82%B9%E5%AF%B9%E7%82%B9%E5%86%85%E7%BD%91%E7%A9%BF%E9%80%8F
目前处于开发的初级阶段,并不能穿透所有类型的 NAT 设备,所以穿透成功率较低。穿透失败时可以尝试 stcp 的方式。
@zhuwei commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2022):
@fatedier 这个功能以后还会完善吗?