mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #103] Firejail documentation a bit unclear/inconsistent #63
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#63
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @curiosity-seeker on GitHub (Oct 27, 2015).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/103
In the supplied profiles the
noblacklistcommand is widely used - but it's completely undocumented inman firejail. Andman firejail-profileonly says:On the other hand, the
whitelistcommand is mentioned in both man pages. However, it remains unclear, IMO, howwhitelistdiffers exactly fromnoblacklist. I think it would be great if this were clarified in the documentation. Thanks!@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2015):
In the latest version, in man firejail-profile I have:
The exclude-token thing will disappear in the next release.
@curiosity-seeker commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2015):
Thanks, I was referring to the 0.9.32 versions.
@curiosity-seeker commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2015):
netblue30, I'm sorry to appear stubborn - but I still think those aspects are not well documented. E.g, the default Firefox profile in v. 0.9.34 contains both
How do both rules differ from each other? I'm afraid that most users have difficulties to understand that. Well, at least I don't.
@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2015):
In this case noblacklist ends up doing nothing, because whitelist erases everything in home directory. I'll clean it up at some point.