mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #895] IPv6 nameservers #606
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#606
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @reinerh on GitHub (Nov 6, 2016).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/895
Hi,
this is not a bug report, just some information about an issue Aidan Gauland reported on the Debian bugtracker.
He was using a firejail sandbox with --net=eth0 and was losing internet connectivity inside the sandbox (but not outside).
We figured out hostname resolution suddenly stopped working. He is using rdnssd on the host, which is a tool that autodiscovers IPv6 nameservers. This was overwriting the resolv.conf with a nameserver detected on the local network.
The content looked like this:
nameserver fe80::c6e9:84ff:1234:abcd%eth0But as there was no eth0 interface inside the sandbox (instead there is a eth0-nnnnn interface), the nameserver was no longer reachable.
He also suggests to document this behavior on the known issues page.
@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Nov 6, 2016):
Thanks, I'll look into it.
@matu3ba commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020):
@reinerh @netblue30 Is this still relevant/reproducable or can this be closed?
@reinerh commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020):
I would say that's still relevant.