mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #6956] Some system calls can not be whitelisted #3433
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#3433
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @pierretom on GitHub (Nov 2, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/6956
For example:
441 - epoll_pwait2
449 - futex_waitv
seccomp.keep epoll_pwait2,futex_waitv,...seccomp.log
Also those system calls do not appear with
--debug-syscallsbut are present in syscalls.list.@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2025):
The syscall lists and groups in firejail are seriously out of date by a few years. This affects the ability to name syscalls in
seccomp.*(by number syntax could work) but also blacklisting of newer syscalls that provide a superset of an older blocked syscall.If anyone wants to PR, here are the relevant files:
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/blob/master/src/include/syscall_x86_64.h
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/blob/master/src/include/syscall_i386.h
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/blob/master/src/include/syscall_armeabi.h
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/blob/master/src/include/syscall_aarch64.h
@pierretom commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025):
Ok, work in progress.