mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #5191] Backports for CVE-2022-31214 fix #2908
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#2908
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @reinerh on GitHub (Jun 11, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/5191
Hi,
Debian currently ships firejail 0.9.64.4 in stable and 0.9.58.2 in oldstable.
stable-backports will get a backported 0.9.70 that contains the fix, but not every stable user has the backports repository enabled.
I tried to apply the patch to 0.9.64.4, but there are several conflicts.
Is someone planning on backporting the fixes to other versions as well?
@smitsohu commented on GitHub (Jun 12, 2022):
I can backport the patch to 0.9.66, 0.9.64.4 and 0.9.58
It will take a bit of time, I'll report back on Monday.
@smitsohu commented on GitHub (Jun 13, 2022):
Sorry, it is not finished yet.
But it should be ready later today.
@smitsohu commented on GitHub (Jun 14, 2022):
Alright, I'm providing early patch versions, but they are still undertested.
I understand that time is in short supply here, but it will take me probably one more day to get a more appropriate level of confidence.
CVE-2022-31214.zip
@smitsohu commented on GitHub (Jun 15, 2022):
Didn't find any issues ...
Should be good!
@reinerh commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2022):
Thanks @smitsohu!
I've prepared an update for 0.9.64.4 in stable, which should soon get accepted as a security update. I will also do the 0.9.58.2 update in oldstable.