mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #4465] [Website] remove trackers and embeds and make the site legal in the EU #2674
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#2674
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @D3V1LC0D3R on GitHub (Aug 10, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/4465
Bug and expected behavior
When opening your webpage following trackers are loaded:
expected behaviour: ask before you load thirdparty resources or disable them completely
Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Additional context
i hope this was not intentional as you're literally breaking european law (GDPR)
Checklist
@kmk3 commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2021):
@D3V1LC0D3R commented 12 hours ago:
+1 to completely removing the following:
In the case of third-party embeds that require JavaScript (such as YouTube's),
I would go with one of the following:
work)
One working example of the former that comes to mind is how GamingOnLinux does
it. For example, see this recent article:
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2021/08/impressive-free-and-open-source-rts-0-ad-alpha-25-is-out-now
It contains the following at the very end:
Other than having an
eventon the "Accept Cookies & Show" button, it's allplain HTML.
I don't know much about WordPress and I don't know how straightforward this
would be to implement in it, but at least in pure HTML it does not appear to be
too complicated.
@SkewedZeppelin commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2021):
@rusty-snake 's website rewrite solves this afaik.
@kmk3 commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
@SkewedZeppelin commented 38 minutes ago:
Yes, the rewrite does not appear to be affected by this, but it's still WIP
AFAIK. Here's a link for future reference:
https://rusty-snake.github.io/firejail/
So while the wordpress site is considered the official/canonical one (which I
assume will be the case for a while), I think that at least removing the
aforementioned trackers would be a big improvement and also potentially easy to
do.
@kmk3 commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
Links to issues related to the rewrite for cross-reference:
@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
👍 The only third-partys are fonts.googleapis.com which can be removed and youtube.com which can be made click2play+youtube-nocookie.com or changed to first-party or peertube if we want.
@topimiettinen commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
I don't think GDPR works like this at all, your interpretation would probably make most Wordpress pages or those which embed youtube videos sites illegal. For example, German Wordpress (https://wordpress.com/de/) links also to stats.wp.com and uses Google APIs and I think German interpretation of GDPR is stricter than some other EU countries. Can you point to legal analysis where third party resources in frame of GDPR are discussed?
Having said that, removing trackers and/or switching away from Wordpress makes sense.
@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
Even the website of the "Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit" (en: Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information; https://www.bfdi.bund.de) includes
piwik.itzbund.de. Maybe because of a legitimate interests or because it does not collect personally identifiable information (PII). IDK but that are the two relevant terms in the GDPR AFAIK. (IANAL)Not sure if @D3V1LC0D3R mean that referring to the GDPR or as a privacy best practice.
Anyway the only third-parties that are "necessary" are
(site rant) Had anyone said copyright?
You did what? You linked to a yt video which includes a illegal copied meme for 2s at a halfscreen?!
@D3V1LC0D3R commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
to my knowledge it is illegal in germany: https://usercentrics.com/knowledge-hub/non-compliant-cookie-banner/
@D3V1LC0D3R commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
this is illegal, as the german court considered this as not a legal consent.
source: https://www.datenschutzerklaerung.info/cookie-consent-tools-lg-rostock/
EDIT: image source: https://www.finch.com/blog/cookie-consent-tools-and-nudging/
@D3V1LC0D3R commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
as a matter of fact github uses illegal data collection practices as well (they have an eventlogger and a browser fingerprinter without any consent)
@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
Well if you have a GH account you accepted GH's privacy statement, but if not ...
@D3V1LC0D3R commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
no accepting a policy does not mean that a company do anything to you. You have to be well informed (or did you know that every github email includes a tracking pixel < img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/[ID].gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" / >)
@kmk3 commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):
@rusty-snake commented on Aug 11:
That would be nice and to expand a bit on it: I'm more inclined towards just
using "serif", "sans-serif" and "monospace" and letting the browser use the
native/configured fonts. If custom fonts would make a significant difference,
they could be committed to the repo (preferably fonts under a libre font
license).
Nice; click2play (/click2loadTheEmbed) would be the most important change IMO,
as it deals with third-party proprietary JavaScript.
I don't know about the pros/cons of youtube.com vs youtube-nocookie.com; the
only site I remember seeing using the latter is Wikia.
A PeerTube mirror would be great (see #4076).
If by "first-party" you mean comitting videos to a repository, I'm not sure if
that would be a good idea, considering non-trivial video sizes and it might be
against the ToS. If that's workable, I'd put them on a separate repository
(e.g.: firejail-media) to not bloat up the main one.
By the way, since there is no issue tracker in the rewrite repo, should we open
issues about it in here?
@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021):
I could enable it, however nobody will see it there.
https://www.ghacks.net/2018/05/23/why-you-should-always-use-youtubes-privacy-enhanced-mode/
@topimiettinen commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021):
I think you are confusing uses of cookies (and related requests) with links to third party sites.
@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2021):
🚀 Third-parties are removed from https://rusty-snake.github.io/firejail/.
fonts.googleapis.comis blocked via CSP (ATM)img.youtube.comis still contacted to fetch the thumbnail. This can be fixed together with all the other images.@SkewedZeppelin commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2021):
I use this:
You can find various variations of it online.
@D3V1LC0D3R commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2022):
i guess this is mostly solved, thanx