[GH-ISSUE #3999] Firejail usage

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:52 -06:00

Owner

Originally created by @tansm11 on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3999

My laptop OS is Linux Mint 19.1 "Tessa" Cinnamon edition (64-bit).

Before Linux, I was using Windows 10. I installed and used a software called Sandboxie. Sandboxie runs your programs in an isolated space which prevents them from making permanent changes to other programs and data in your computer.
I can install any Windows application in what they called sandbox and then run the Windows application in the sandbox. When I throw away the sandbox, everything that is written to it will be lost. This is extremely useful when I try out suspicious software. If the software contains malware or I just don't like it, I just throw away the sandbox and the program disappears completely.
It also offers secure web browsing by running your Web browser under the protection of Sandboxie means that all malicious software downloaded by the browser is trapped in the sandbox and can be discarded.

Will Firejail work like Sandboxie?

Let's say I want to try out software XX. So, I go install software XX. Then, I run software XX. I don't like it. So, I want everything to be completely disappeared like as if software XX has never been installed. How do I go about it using Firejail?

Originally created by @tansm11 on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3999 My laptop OS is Linux Mint 19.1 "Tessa" Cinnamon edition (64-bit). Before Linux, I was using Windows 10. I installed and used a software called Sandboxie. Sandboxie runs your programs in an isolated space which prevents them from making permanent changes to other programs and data in your computer. I can install any Windows application in what they called sandbox and then run the Windows application in the sandbox. When I throw away the sandbox, everything that is written to it will be lost. This is extremely useful when I try out suspicious software. If the software contains malware or I just don't like it, I just throw away the sandbox and the program disappears completely. It also offers secure web browsing by running your Web browser under the protection of Sandboxie means that all malicious software downloaded by the browser is trapped in the sandbox and can be discarded. Will Firejail work like Sandboxie? Let's say I want to try out software XX. So, I go install software XX. Then, I run software XX. I don't like it. So, I want everything to be completely disappeared like as if software XX has never been installed. How do I go about it using Firejail?

gitea-mirror

2026-05-05 09:10:52 -06:00

closed this issue
added the
stale
label

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:55 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

Will Firejail work like Sandboxie?

No, it's an other software. Best you start some reading.
https://firejail.wordpress.com/features-3/
https://firejail.wordpress.com/documentation-2/

Let's say I want to try out software XX. So, I go install software XX. Then, I run software XX. I don't like it. So, I want everything to be completely disappeared like as if software XX has never been installed. How do I go about it using Firejail?

On Linux you install software usually with your packages manager, so the install/remove is very difficult to sandbox. However have a look at the private and private-home features.

try out suspicious software

You should not do this.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): > Will Firejail work like Sandboxie? No, it's an other software. Best you start some reading. https://firejail.wordpress.com/features-3/ https://firejail.wordpress.com/documentation-2/ > Let's say I want to try out software XX. So, I go install software XX. Then, I run software XX. I don't like it. So, I want everything to be completely disappeared like as if software XX has never been installed. How do I go about it using Firejail? On Linux you install software usually with your packages manager, so the install/remove is very difficult to sandbox. However have a look at the `private` and `private-home` features. > try out suspicious software You should not do this.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:56 -06:00

Author

Owner

@FOSSONLY commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

On Linux you install software usually with your packages manager, so the install/remove is very difficult to sandbox.

This has changed in the meantime. While I can't speak for other package managers, apt has been running under a restricted user (_apt) for quite some time, and also has an optional seccomp filter that can be enabled (APT::Sandbox::Seccomp "1") in apt's configuration.

@FOSSONLY commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): > On Linux you install software usually with your packages manager, so the install/remove is very difficult to sandbox. This has changed in the meantime. While I can't speak for other package managers, apt has been running under a restricted user (_apt) for quite some time, and also has an optional seccomp filter that can be enabled (APT::Sandbox::Seccomp "1") in apt's configuration.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:57 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

Is there any way to make Firejail to do like this? :

I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed.

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): Is there any way to make Firejail to do like this? : I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:58 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

This has changed in the meantime. While I can't speak for other package managers, apt has been running under a restricted user (_apt) for quite some time, and also has an optional seccomp filter that can be enabled (APT::Sandbox::Seccomp "1") in apt's configuration.

But still has full write access to the file-system, it doesn't? I see no real benefit if it can write to sudoers or bashrc or whatever. From what kind of attacker should it protect?

I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed.

Sound podman/docker is more what you search for. However, you could use the chroot feature or use AppImages.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): > This has changed in the meantime. While I can't speak for other package managers, apt has been running under a restricted user (_apt) for quite some time, and also has an optional seccomp filter that can be enabled (APT::Sandbox::Seccomp "1") in apt's configuration. But still has full write access to the file-system, it doesn't? I see no real benefit if it can write to sudoers or bashrc or whatever. From what kind of attacker should it protect? > I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed. Sound podman/docker is more what you search for. However, you could use the `chroot` feature or use AppImages.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:10:59 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2021):

I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed.

Sound podman/docker is more what you search for. However, you could use the chroot feature or use AppImages.

That is close but not close to what I'm looking for.

I'm thinking if Firejail can do like this:

I run Firejail. Then, I install a Linux software (doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager) and then I run the Linux software. Then, I close/shutdown Firejail. Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2021): > > I create a container/sandbox. I install a software. I run the software. I delete/remove the container/sandbox and the software I had been installed will completely disappeared like as if the software has never been installed. > > Sound podman/docker is more what you search for. However, you could use the `chroot` feature or use AppImages. That is close but not close to what I'm looking for. I'm thinking if Firejail can do like this: I run Firejail. Then, I install a Linux software (doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager) and then I run the Linux software. Then, I close/shutdown Firejail. Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:00 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021):

As I said podman is closer to that what you need IMO.

doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager

Matters because Software Manager uses PackageKit.

Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible?

With --overlayfs-tmpfs. However it is disable.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021): As I said podman is closer to that what you need IMO. > doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager Matters because Software Manager uses PackageKit. > Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible? With `--overlayfs-tmpfs`. However it is disable.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:01 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021):

As I said podman is closer to that what you need IMO.

doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager

Matters because Software Manager uses PackageKit.

Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible?

With --overlayfs-tmpfs. However it is disable.

Maybe I didn't make it clear enough.

Actually, I want to try out a Linux software but I don't want it to make any changes to my real Linux computer system (starting from the time I install it until the time I run it and until the time after I remove it). How can I do that using Firejail?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021): > As I said podman is closer to that what you need IMO. > > > doesn't matter whether from Debian package or from Terminal or from Software Manager > > Matters because Software Manager uses PackageKit. > > > Whatever filesystem modifications have been done while installing and running the software all will be gone. The host filesystem is not touched. Is that possible? > > With `--overlayfs-tmpfs`. However it is disable. Maybe I didn't make it clear enough. Actually, I want to try out a Linux software but I don't want it to make any changes to my real Linux computer system (starting from the time I install it until the time I run it and until the time after I remove it). How can I do that using Firejail?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:02 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021):

With the overlayfs feature. But it is disabled at the moment, so you need to workaround it with the chroot feature or by use an other software (docker, podman, runc, crun, bwrap, mount, minijail, systemd-nspawn (example 6), lxc, lxd, ...) together with firejail or not.

To warn again: PackageKit uses D-Bus and therefore it shoots back. (If you want to say so)

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021): With the overlayfs feature. But it is disabled at the moment, so you need to workaround it with the chroot feature or by use an other software (docker, podman, runc, crun, bwrap, mount, minijail, systemd-nspawn ([example 6](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html#Examples)), lxc, lxd, ...) together with firejail or not. To warn again: PackageKit uses D-Bus and therefore it shoots back. (If you want to say so)

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021):

With the overlayfs feature. But it is disabled at the moment, so you need to workaround it with the chroot feature or by use an other software (docker, podman, runc, crun, bwrap, mount, minijail, systemd-nspawn (example 6), lxc, lxd, ...) together with firejail or not.

To warn again: PackageKit uses D-Bus and therefore it shoots back. (If you want to say so)

So, it seems that the overlayfs feature is the closest to the one that I'm looking for. Oh no!.....Please don't be disabled.

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021): > With the overlayfs feature. But it is disabled at the moment, so you need to workaround it with the chroot feature or by use an other software (docker, podman, runc, crun, bwrap, mount, minijail, systemd-nspawn ([example 6](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html#Examples)), lxc, lxd, ...) together with firejail or not. > > To warn again: PackageKit uses D-Bus and therefore it shoots back. (If you want to say so) So, it seems that the overlayfs feature is the closest to the one that I'm looking for. Oh no!.....Please don't be disabled.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:03 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2021):

I played a bit: Test successfully start zenity --info

bwrap: has no overlayfs
podman: SELinux kicks in
fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash
mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works
systemd-nspawn: works

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2021): I played a bit: Test successfully start `zenity --info` - bwrap: has no overlayfs - podman: SELinux kicks in - fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash - mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works - systemd-nspawn: works

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:04 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

I played a bit: Test successfully start zenity --info

* bwrap: has no overlayfs

* podman: SELinux kicks in

* fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash

* mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works

* systemd-nspawn: works

You mentioned "podman: SELinux kicks in", so it works or not?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): > I played a bit: Test successfully start `zenity --info` > > * bwrap: has no overlayfs > > * podman: SELinux kicks in > > * fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash > > * mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works > > * systemd-nspawn: works You mentioned "podman: SELinux kicks in", so it works or not?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:04 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

Did more playing with podman: It works with --security-opt=label=disable.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): Did more playing with podman: It works with `--security-opt=label=disable`.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:04 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

I played a bit: Test successfully start zenity --info

* bwrap: has no overlayfs

* podman: SELinux kicks in

* fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash

* mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works

* systemd-nspawn: works

For "mount -t overlay + firejail", what are the steps to apply?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): > I played a bit: Test successfully start `zenity --info` > > * bwrap: has no overlayfs > > * podman: SELinux kicks in > > * fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash > > * mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works > > * systemd-nspawn: works For "mount -t overlay + firejail", what are the steps to apply?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:05 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

Collected form my shell history, maybe not complete.

sudo mkdir /overlayfs
# only if you want
sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=2G,mode=0755,uid=0,gid=0 tmpfs /overlayfs
sudo mkdir -p /overlayfs/{root,diff,work}
sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work overlay /overlayfs/root
sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/home,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work /overlayfs/root/home
# overlay mount any other mount point that you have and need
sudo mkdir -p /overlayfs/root/run/user/$UID
sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/run/user/$UID,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work /overlayfs/root/run/user/$UID
firejail --chroot=/overlayfs/root --noprofile bash
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/$UID zenity --info
exit
sudo umount /overlayfs/root/run/user/1000
sudo umount /overlayfs/root/home
sudo umount /overlayfs/root
sudo umount /overlayfs 
sudo rmdir /overlayfs

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): Collected form my shell history, maybe not complete. ```bash sudo mkdir /overlayfs # only if you want sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=2G,mode=0755,uid=0,gid=0 tmpfs /overlayfs sudo mkdir -p /overlayfs/{root,diff,work} sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work overlay /overlayfs/root sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/home,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work /overlayfs/root/home # overlay mount any other mount point that you have and need sudo mkdir -p /overlayfs/root/run/user/$UID sudo mount -t overlay overlay -o lowerdir=/run/user/$UID,upperdir=/overlayfs/diff,workdir=/overlayfs/work /overlayfs/root/run/user/$UID firejail --chroot=/overlayfs/root --noprofile bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/$UID zenity --info exit sudo umount /overlayfs/root/run/user/1000 sudo umount /overlayfs/root/home sudo umount /overlayfs/root sudo umount /overlayfs sudo rmdir /overlayfs ```

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:05 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

I played a bit: Test successfully start zenity --info

* bwrap: has no overlayfs

* podman: SELinux kicks in

* fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash

* mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works

* systemd-nspawn: works

For "systemd-nspawn (example 6)", it virtualizes host system together with any removable drives that connected to my computer?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): > I played a bit: Test successfully start `zenity --info` > > * bwrap: has no overlayfs > > * podman: SELinux kicks in > > * fuse-overlayfs + firejail --chroot: system crash > > * mount -t overlay + firejail: welcome to hell, but works > > * systemd-nspawn: works For "systemd-nspawn ([example 6](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html#Examples))", it virtualizes host system together with any removable drives that connected to my computer?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:06 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

virtualizes host system

It does not virtualizes anything. virtualization is kvm (for example), emulation is qemu (for example; except qemu-kvm). All tools I listed have no virtualization/emulation.

together with any removable drives that connected to my computer

Yes, like firejail, bwrap or podman (always depending on the used arguments/parameters/commands/options/flags/...).

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): > virtualizes host system It does not virtualizes anything. virtualization is kvm (for example), emulation is qemu (for example; except qemu-kvm). All tools I listed have no virtualization/emulation. > together with any removable drives that connected to my computer Yes, like firejail, bwrap or podman (always depending on the used arguments/parameters/commands/options/flags/...).

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:06 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

What I did for testing:

sudo systemd-nspawn --link-journal=no --volatile=yes --overlay=/usr::/usr --overlay=/home::/home --overlay=/etc::/etc -D / --tmpfs=$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR:uid=$UID,gid=$GID,mode=0700 --bind=$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/wayland-0 --user=$UID --as-pid2 /bin/bash
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/1000 zenity --info

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): What I did for testing: ```bash sudo systemd-nspawn --link-journal=no --volatile=yes --overlay=/usr::/usr --overlay=/home::/home --overlay=/etc::/etc -D / --tmpfs=$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR:uid=$UID,gid=$GID,mode=0700 --bind=$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/wayland-0 --user=$UID --as-pid2 /bin/bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/1000 zenity --info ```

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:07 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

virtualizes host system

It does not virtualizes anything. virtualization is kvm (for example), emulation is qemu (for example; except qemu-kvm). All tools I listed have no virtualization/emulation.

together with any removable drives that connected to my computer

Yes, like firejail, bwrap or podman (always depending on the used arguments/parameters/commands/options/flags/...).

Yes, it does virtualizes. If you read the description of systemd-nspawn, it stated there:

systemd-nspawn may be used to run a command or OS in a light-weight namespace container. In many ways it is similar to chroot(1), but more powerful since it fully virtualizes the file system hierarchy, as well as the process tree, the various IPC subsystems and the host and domain name.

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): > > virtualizes host system > > It does not virtualizes anything. virtualization is kvm (for example), emulation is qemu (for example; except qemu-kvm). All tools I listed have no virtualization/emulation. > > > together with any removable drives that connected to my computer > > Yes, like firejail, bwrap or podman (always depending on the used arguments/parameters/commands/options/flags/...). Yes, it does virtualizes. If you read the [description](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html#Description) of systemd-nspawn, it stated there: systemd-nspawn may be used to run a command or OS in a light-weight namespace container. In many ways it is similar to chroot(1), but more powerful since it fully virtualizes the file system hierarchy, as well as the process tree, the various IPC subsystems and the host and domain name.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:07 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

The file system (and some other ns), but not the host system (which includes your cpu, disk, ...). Anyway these are quibbles.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): The file system (and some other ns), but not the host system (which includes your cpu, disk, ...). Anyway these are quibbles.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:07 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

I'm sorry I think I have misunderstood about that virtualize thing.

Let's get back to "systemd-nspawn (example 6)".

It runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot and at the same time it runs a copy of any removable drives that connected to my computer in that same snapshot?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): I'm sorry I think I have misunderstood about that virtualize thing. Let's get back to "systemd-nspawn ([example 6](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html#Examples))". It runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot and at the same time it runs a copy of any removable drives that connected to my computer in that same snapshot?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:08 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

Yes, it's like mkdir /new_root && cp -r --reflink=auto --exclude=/new_root / /new_root (cp has no --exclude).

... but it can also bind, robind and overlayfs.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): Yes, it's like `mkdir /new_root && cp -r --reflink=auto --exclude=/new_root / /new_root` (cp has no `--exclude`). ... but it can also bind, robind and overlayfs.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:08 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

While it runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot, is there any way to whitelist any removable drives that connected to my computer? So that while it runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot, I can still save anything onto any removable drives that connected to my computer during its runtime and that saving in that removable drives will not be lost on shutdown.

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): While it runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot, is there any way to whitelist any removable drives that connected to my computer? So that while it runs a copy of the host system in a snapshot, I can still save anything onto any removable drives that connected to my computer during its runtime and that saving in that removable drives will not be lost on shutdown.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:08 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021):

Just --bind the upper directory.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2021): Just `--bind` the upper directory.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:09 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021):

You mean I just --bind the internal hard drive of my computer?

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021): You mean I just `--bind` the internal hard drive of my computer?

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:09 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021):

No --bind /media or /run/media or where else the external driver gets mounted.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021): No `--bind` `/media` or `/run/media` or where else the external driver gets mounted.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:10 -06:00

Author

Owner

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021):

Oh, okay.

@tansm11 commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021): Oh, okay.

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-05 09:11:10 -06:00

Author

Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

I'm closing here due to inactivity, please fell free to request to reopen if you have more questions.

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): I'm closing here due to inactivity, please fell free to request to reopen if you have more questions.

gitea-mirror referenced this issue

2026-05-05 10:18:37 -06:00

[PR #2498] [MERGED] Add new profile for geekbench #4359

Rows
Columns

[GH-ISSUE #3999] Firejail usage #2498