mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #2805] net none in udiskie profile is causing dbus errors #1757
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#1757
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @jose1711 on GitHub (Jun 28, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2805
udiskiecomplains about inability to connect do accessibily bus unless this line is commented out in its profiled824eee1d0/etc/udiskie.profile (L24)@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2019):
Not only udiskie, the most GTK+3 app have this.
@jose1711 commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2019):
Maybe it could be mentioned in template too then
@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Jul 4, 2019):
I wouldn't worry about it, unless you use some of the accessibility features. They communicate over DBus, and "net none' is shutting down the socket.
@jose1711 commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2019):
My understanding so far was that any error reported by the application and caused by too restrictive profile should be fixed. Maybe we need a definition what's an acceptable error and what is not. Though I am not sure if the one breaking accessibility features really belong to the first category.
@Vincent43 commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2019):
There is already
protocol unixin the udisks profile which should block network access so perhapsnet nonecould be dropped.@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2019):
I'm closing here due to inactivity, please fell free to reopen if you have more questions.