[GH-ISSUE #2755] Wiki: Sandboxing Binary Software #1729

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 08:24:06 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @netblue30 on GitHub (Jun 10, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2755

Issue for discussions about https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Sandboxing-Binary-Software

Originally created by @netblue30 on GitHub (Jun 10, 2019). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2755 Issue for discussions about https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/wiki/Sandboxing-Binary-Software
gitea-mirror 2026-05-05 08:24:06 -06:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    wiki
    label
Author
Owner

@matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2019):

The description is consistent for LTS versions, but not newer versions. These are installed to /usr/local.
Maybe it would be nice to mention the user to check, if there does exist a profile yet to restrict the programs data access (for example to the default folder).

#397 could be used for further ideas.

<!-- gh-comment-id:504585198 --> @matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jun 21, 2019): The description is consistent for LTS versions, but not newer versions. These are installed to `/usr/local`. Maybe it would be nice to mention the user to check, if there does exist a profile yet to restrict the programs data access (for example to the default folder). <strike> #397 could be used for further ideas. </strike>
Author
Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Jun 22, 2019):

@matu3ba https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2748#issuecomment-504639472

<!-- gh-comment-id:504639766 --> @rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Jun 22, 2019): @matu3ba https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2748#issuecomment-504639472
Author
Owner

@matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jul 2, 2019):

@rusty-snake Did add #2748 command to Profiles and linked there.

<!-- gh-comment-id:507650490 --> @matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jul 2, 2019): @rusty-snake Did add #2748 command to Profiles and linked there.
Author
Owner

@matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2019):

Closing this?

<!-- gh-comment-id:509168897 --> @matu3ba commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2019): Closing this?
Author
Owner

@Mikaela commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2020):

Would it be OK to add instructions to verify gpg signatures of applications on the page?

For example with Tor Browser it would be adding

  • gpg --auto-key-locate nodefault,wkd --locate-keys torbrowser@torproject.org
  • gpg --verify tor-browser-linux64-8.5.1_en-US.tar.xz.sig

With Firefox it would be a bit more tricky digging the signature from https://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/ and key from https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2019/06/13/updated-firefox-gpg-key/

<!-- gh-comment-id:583880873 --> @Mikaela commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2020): Would it be OK to add instructions to verify gpg signatures of applications on the page? For example with Tor Browser it would be adding * `gpg --auto-key-locate nodefault,wkd --locate-keys torbrowser@torproject.org` * `gpg --verify tor-browser-linux64-8.5.1_en-US.tar.xz.sig` With Firefox it would be a bit more tricky digging the signature from https://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/ and key from https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2019/06/13/updated-firefox-gpg-key/
Author
Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2020):

Sounds good to me.

<!-- gh-comment-id:584000733 --> @rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2020): Sounds good to me.
Author
Owner

@rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021):

https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/discussions/4449

<!-- gh-comment-id:892734997 --> @rusty-snake commented on GitHub (Aug 4, 2021): https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/discussions/4449
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/firejail#1729
No description provided.