mirror of
https://github.com/netblue30/firejail.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:14 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #2208] Consider migrating from Travis-CI to Github Actions #1480
Labels
No labels
LTS merge
LTS merge
bug
bug
converted-to-discussion
doc-todo
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
file-transfer
firecfg
firejail-in-firejail
firetools
graphics
help wanted
information_old
installation
invalid
modif
moved
needinfo
networking
notabug
notourbug
old-version
overlayfs
packaging
profile-request
pull-request
question
question_old
removal
runtime-permissions
sandbox-ipc
security
stale
wiki
wiki
wontfix
wordpress
workaround
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/firejail#1480
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Vincent43 on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2208
Github Actions is new service (beta) for CI. Perhaps it has better intergration than third party services and maybe more features.
@chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):
I'd personally be wary of integrating too much into Github. The main reason (of course) is that Github is now owned by Microsoft. Yeah, they've been better to the OSS community recently, but I still don't trust them, and if we have to jump ship for whatever reason, the fewer disruptions, the better.
@Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):
Any particular reason we couldn't use both? It would give us more redundancy if Travis CI goes down.
@Vincent43 commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):
Sure we can use both. In case we have to jump ship it will break everything anyway. We may consider to create mirror (read-only) on gitlab.
@Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):
Tried that previously -- IIRC it works well. 😄
@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2018):
We'll use both of them. TravisCI runs on Ubuntu 14.04, maybe we can get something newer from these guys. The test in Travis covers about 55% of the code (this is the number from 6 months ago), if we get a newer kernel we can bump up the coverage.
@chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (May 29, 2019):
Let's move the discussion over to #2729.