[GH-ISSUE #2208] Consider migrating from Travis-CI to Github Actions #1480

Closed
opened 2026-05-05 08:08:54 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Vincent43 on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2208

Github Actions is new service (beta) for CI. Perhaps it has better intergration than third party services and maybe more features.

Originally created by @Vincent43 on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/2208 [Github Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) is new service (beta) for CI. Perhaps it has better intergration than third party services and maybe more features.
gitea-mirror 2026-05-05 08:08:54 -06:00
Author
Owner

@chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):

I'd personally be wary of integrating too much into Github. The main reason (of course) is that Github is now owned by Microsoft. Yeah, they've been better to the OSS community recently, but I still don't trust them, and if we have to jump ship for whatever reason, the fewer disruptions, the better.

<!-- gh-comment-id:431590854 --> @chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018): I'd personally be wary of integrating too much into Github. The main reason (of course) is that Github is now owned by Microsoft. Yeah, they've been better to the OSS community recently, but I still don't trust them, and if we have to jump ship for whatever reason, the fewer disruptions, the better.
Author
Owner

@Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):

Any particular reason we couldn't use both? It would give us more redundancy if Travis CI goes down.

<!-- gh-comment-id:431599441 --> @Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018): Any particular reason we couldn't use both? It would give us more redundancy if Travis CI goes down.
Author
Owner

@Vincent43 commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):

Sure we can use both. In case we have to jump ship it will break everything anyway. We may consider to create mirror (read-only) on gitlab.

<!-- gh-comment-id:431600091 --> @Vincent43 commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018): Sure we can use both. In case we have to jump ship it will break everything anyway. We may consider to create mirror (read-only) on gitlab.
Author
Owner

@Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018):

We may consider create mirror on gitlab.

Tried that previously -- IIRC it works well. 😄

<!-- gh-comment-id:431605625 --> @Fred-Barclay commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2018): > We may consider create mirror on gitlab. Tried that previously -- IIRC it works well. :smile:
Author
Owner

@netblue30 commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2018):

We'll use both of them. TravisCI runs on Ubuntu 14.04, maybe we can get something newer from these guys. The test in Travis covers about 55% of the code (this is the number from 6 months ago), if we get a newer kernel we can bump up the coverage.

<!-- gh-comment-id:431675914 --> @netblue30 commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2018): We'll use both of them. TravisCI runs on Ubuntu 14.04, maybe we can get something newer from these guys. The test in Travis covers about 55% of the code (this is the number from 6 months ago), if we get a newer kernel we can bump up the coverage.
Author
Owner

@chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (May 29, 2019):

Let's move the discussion over to #2729.

<!-- gh-comment-id:496990163 --> @chiraag-nataraj commented on GitHub (May 29, 2019): Let's move the discussion over to #2729.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: github-starred/firejail#1480
No description provided.