mirror of
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier.git
synced 2026-05-15 14:16:02 -06:00
[GH-ISSUE #499] Could you please tell what was the last Windows 32 supported version? #388
Labels
No labels
HiDPI
bounty
bsd/freebsd
bsd/openbsd
bug
bug
build-infra
cantfix
critical
doc
duplicate
enhancement
fix-available
from git
from release
good first issue
help wanted
installer/package
invalid
linux
macOS
meta
needs testing
pull-request
query
question
regression
regression
v2.4.0
windows
wontfix
work-in-progress
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: github-starred/barrier#388
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @rin67630 on GitHub (Nov 19, 2019).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/issues/499
Many legacy systems / tablets are running 32 bit.
Synergy ran on them.
Could you please at least mention which was your last 32 bit compatible version?
Thank you.
@AdrianKoshka commented on GitHub (Nov 19, 2019):
To my knowledge, you should still be able to build barrier for 32-bit windows systems, we just don't officially support 32-bit versions of windows.
@rin67630 commented on GitHub (Dec 10, 2019):
The installer refuses to install on a 32 bit tablet.
@AdrianKoshka commented on GitHub (Dec 10, 2019):
We only support 64-bit windows for the installer.
@mirh commented on GitHub (Jul 25, 2020):
The installer still seems to install just fine even on x86 tbh.
You are only greeted with the hard reality once you try to run the program.
@shymega commented on GitHub (Jul 28, 2020):
Yes, its true that the installer works fine on i386. My personal opinion is that we should begin supporting 32-bit again.. but I know there's a bit of opposition there. @debauchee/barrier-developers - thoughts? Reopening for further discussion.
@p12tic commented on GitHub (Jan 11, 2021):
I think that support as many architectures as reasonably possible should be our goal.