Address unnecessary compiler warnings without altering behavior of plugins

This commit is contained in:
Christopher Johnson 2023-04-12 15:44:04 -04:00
parent 3c534619e4
commit d208e57441
32 changed files with 104 additions and 104 deletions

View file

@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void CStrip::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampleFr
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;
@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ void CStrip::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt32
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;

View file

@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ void CStrip::CStripKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) {count = 2048;}
p[count+2048] = p[count] = inputSample;

View file

@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;
@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;
@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::NaturalizeDitherKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourc
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::NotJustAnotherCDKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourc
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ void Righteous4::Righteous4Kernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ void CStrip::CStripKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) {count = 2048;}
p[count+2048] = p[count] = inputSample;

View file

@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;
@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;
@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ void Ditherbox::DitherboxKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::NaturalizeDitherKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourc
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::NotJustAnotherCDKernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourc
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ void Righteous4::Righteous4Kernel::Process( const Float32 *inSourceP,
totalA = byn[1] + byn[2] + byn[3] + byn[4] + byn[5] + byn[6] + byn[7] + byn[8] + byn[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
byn[1] /= totalA;
byn[2] /= totalA;
byn[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void CStrip::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampleFr
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;
@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ void CStrip::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt32
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;

View file

@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void CStrip::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampleFr
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;
@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ void CStrip::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt32
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;

View file

@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void CStrip::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampleFr
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;
@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ void CStrip::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt32
//end EQ
//begin Timing
if (engageTiming = true)
if (engageTiming)
{
if (count < 1 || count > 2048) count = 2048;

View file

@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 sampl
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ void Ditherbox::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstInt
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ void NaturalizeDither::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt3
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ void NotJustAnotherCD::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs,
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;

View file

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void Righteous4::processReplacing(float **inputs, float **outputs, VstInt32 samp
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynL[1] + bynL[2] + bynL[3] + bynL[4] + bynL[5] + bynL[6] + bynL[7] + bynL[8] + bynL[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynL[1] /= totalA;
bynL[2] /= totalA;
bynL[3] /= totalA;
@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ void Righteous4::processDoubleReplacing(double **inputs, double **outputs, VstIn
totalA = bynR[1] + bynR[2] + bynR[3] + bynR[4] + bynR[5] + bynR[6] + bynR[7] + bynR[8] + bynR[9];
totalA /= 1000;
if (totalA = 0) totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
totalA = 1; // spotted by Laserbat: this 'scaling back' code doesn't. It always divides by the fallback of 1. Old NJAD doesn't scale back the things we're comparing against. Kept to retain known behavior, use the one in StudioTan and Monitoring for a tuned-as-intended NJAD.
bynR[1] /= totalA;
bynR[2] /= totalA;
bynR[3] /= totalA;